On June 26, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court announced its
rulings on two landmark cases related to same-sex marriage. The 5-4 decisions
bolster the federal benefits available to same-sex married couples and clear
the way for same-sex marriages in California.
In the first case, the court struck down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act of 1996 (DOMA), which defined marriage as the union of a man and a woman. This case involved a claim by Edith Windsor, who sought a refund from the IRS of the $363,000 in estate taxes she paid because the federal government did not recognize her marriage to her long-time partner and spouse, Thea Spyer. Her suit contended that DOMA violated the principles of equal protection.
Click here to read full article, which contains details on some of the federal benefits or protections that may now be available to legally married same-sex couples.
In the first case, the court struck down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act of 1996 (DOMA), which defined marriage as the union of a man and a woman. This case involved a claim by Edith Windsor, who sought a refund from the IRS of the $363,000 in estate taxes she paid because the federal government did not recognize her marriage to her long-time partner and spouse, Thea Spyer. Her suit contended that DOMA violated the principles of equal protection.
Click here to read full article, which contains details on some of the federal benefits or protections that may now be available to legally married same-sex couples.